Wilson's Almanac on hoaxes and frauds

Related terms: plagiarism Piltdown Man hoax fraud cheats Shinichi Fujimura
Rigoberta Menchu Tichborne Orton scientific misconduct Ern Malley

 

 

Visit the home of the ezine, where you can subscribe for free

 

Piltdown Man

Piltdown Man after a model by JH McGregor
Original B&W:
Men of the Old Stone Age by Henry Fairfield Osborn, 3rd ed. 1924

 

Piltdown & Co.

Big page of hoaxes, scams, pranks and frauds from the annals of history


            
By Pip Wilson

Why do they do it? Many fine scholars have subverted career and character with extraordinary deceits. Some have just been having some fun with the public, or with scholars.

Over coming months, I will be adding fascinating stories to this and other new pages – England's Piltdown Man*, Australia's Ern Malley poetry hoax, the Tasaday People from the Philippines ...

 

hoax

5 entries found.

From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]

Hoax \Hoax\, n. [Prob. contr. fr. hocus, in hocus-pocus.]

   A deception for mockery or mischief; a deceptive trick or

   story; a practical joke. --Macaulay.

From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]

Hoax \Hoax\, v. t. [imp. & p. p. {Hoaxed}; p. pr. & vb. n.

   {Hoaxing}.]

   To deceive by a story or a trick, for sport or mischief; to

   impose upon sportively. --Lamb.

 

Origin of the Word 'Hoax'

"The word hoax first came into popular use sometime in the middle to late eighteenth century. It is thought to have been a contraction of the word hocus from the conjuror's term hocus pocus. The term hocus pocus itself first appeared in the early seventeenth century. It might have derived from the assumed name of a conjuror in the time of King James who called himself 'The Kings Majesties most excellent Hocus Pocus' because with the performance of every trick he used to call out the nonsense phrase, "Hocus pocus, tontus talontus, vade celeriter jubeo" (later magicians were known to use the phrase 'Hax pax max deus adimax'). This phrase was itself probably an imitation (or mockery) of the phrase used by priests of the Church of Rome when they performed the act of transubstantiation, 'hoc est corpus.'"   Source: The Museum of Hoaxes

 

Click for the Universe today (new window)
Click stars for
the Universe today

Books, DVDs, calendars, posters, mousemats, T-shirts and more. Sales support this project.
Cafe Diem! Our store

 

 

 .

 

To support this project
Search by keywords for books, music, computers, software, home and family products and much more.

 

 Click for Poster Store, or use the seach box to find your subject

Search for posters

 

 

 

One of the fairies photos that fooled Arthur Conan Doyle

One of the fairies photos that fooled Arthur Conan Doyle (b. May 22, 1859);
Frances Griffiths with the fairies, photographed by Elsie Wright in July 1916

May 22, 1859 | Birth of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (d. July 7, 1930), Scottish physician and author, creator of Sherlock Holmes. After his son died in World War I, he dedicated himself to spiritualistic studies. An example is The Coming of the Fairies (1922) in which he supported the existence of 'little people' and spent more than a million dollars on their cause. He was apparently totally convinced of the veracity of the obviously faked Cottingley fairy photographs, which he reproduced in the book, together with theories about the nature and existence of fairies.  

Gerald GardnerDoyle's gullibility possibly was heightened because he had first been told about the photographs by his fellow devotee of esoteria and enthusiastic believer in the pictures, Gerald Gardner, the founder of modern Wicca. By May 1920 Gardner was using slides of the Cottingley pictures at lectures. Doyle saw the first two photos and Gardner convinced him they were real, whereupon Doyle wrote an article on the subject in The Strand, the magazine that published his Holmes tales. Doyle did, however, say that the photos should be tested by disinterested people.

While Doyle was in Australia on a lecture tour in 1921, Gardner sent him information about three more photos that he had been shown by the Cottingley cousins, and Doyle shed any doubts that he might have had, apparently believing that Gardner fit the bill of his "disinterested" person.

Doyle at this time was a major international celebrity, but his fascination with ghosts, fairies and "the afterlife" drew ridicule worldwide. In 1923, as he toured America, an editorial in the New York Times said: "Again Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is placing on many of this country's inhabitants the embarrassing task of trying to strike a balance between their long-established liking for him and their equally well-settled dislike for what he is doing."

Frances Griffiths and Elsie Wright, two young cousins living in Cottingley, near Bradford, England. The children took a total of five photographs between 1916 and 1920 of what appeared to be fairies dancing. The photos showed the fairies as small humans with 1920s style haircuts, dressed in filmy gowns, and with large wings on their backs. One picture is of a gnome, about 12 inches tall, dressed in a somewhat Elizabethan manner, and also with wings.

Examination of the pictures today shows that the fairies look like paper cutouts, having a flat appearance, with lighting that does not match the rest of the photograph. At the time, however, the photos were viewed by many as evidence of fairies, most notably by Doyle ... Read on in the Book of Days

On the left, a Cottingsley fairy. On the right, a Shepperson fairy.
On the left, a Cottingley fairy. On the right, a Shepperson fairy.
Click image for Shepperson's fairies to compare with the photo at the top of this page
(opens in a new window)

 

 

January 16, 1749 | The Bottle Hoax of London

The Battle of Bottle-noddles

On this day in London, one of the worst theatre riots in history occurred. An unknown person advertised that he would this evening, at the Haymarket Theatre, 'play on a common walking cane the music of every instrument now used, to surprising perfection' and 'get into a tavern quart bottle, without equivocation, and while there, sing several songs, and suffer any spectator to handle the bottle; that if any spectator should come masked, he would, if requested, declare who they were; and that in a private room he would produce the representation of any person dead, with which the person requesting it should converse some minutes, as if alive.'

Spectators did, indeed, show up, in great numbers, including the Duke of Cumberland, and paid up to 7 shillings and sixpence. When no performer showed up, a joker in the audience called out that if they paid double, someone would get into a pint bottle. Then pandemonium broke out, with the audience pulling down the theatre sets and the good Duke waving his sword. Someone grabbed it from him and ran with it, saying "Fools should not have such chopping sticks!" (Later, much fun was had by an advertiser in the paper called Old England, who put in a Lost and Found ad for the sword, lost 'from the fat sides of a certain great general in his hasty retreat from the Battle of Bottle-noddles'.) The hoaxer never got any money: his whole reward was the sight of the Haymarket Theatre being dismantled and burned in a pile. 

The Bottle Hoax of Haymarket Theatre, otherwise known as the Battle of Bottle-noddles, was hugely famous in its day; Herman Melville makes mention of the event in Moby Dick

 

 

January 21, 1813 | USA: Eight commissioners of the City of Philadelphia visited Charles Redheffer on the outskirts of the city, near the banks of the Schuylkill River.

Redheffer had set up a working model of what he claimed was a miraculous perpetual motion machine that required no source of energy, but the good burghers revealed his hoax (actually, his fraud, because he was trying to get the commissioners to invest city funds in his device). 

Redheffer slipped out of Philadelphia, later that year taking his scam to New York, only to be exposed by steamboat inventor Robert Fulton, who removed some boards from the wall alongside the machine and exposed a catgut cord that led to the upper floor. Upstairs he found an old man who was turning a hand-crank with one hand and eating bread with the other. An angry audience smashed the bogus machine to bits, and, once again, Redheffer fled.

More    And more

 

 

August 10, Fortsas hoax1840 | The Fortsas Hoax

On this day, an auction of a unique collection of very rare books was scheduled to be held in Binche, Belgium. Earlier that year, a catalogue with the lengthy title 'Catalogue d'une tres-riche mais peu nombreuse collection de livres provenant de la bibliotheque de fen M. le Comte J. N. A. de Fortsas' (Catalogue of a very rich but very small collection of books coming from the library of Monsieur Count J. N. A. Fortsas) had appeared in Europe and received a great deal of attention from book dealers, librarians and book collectors across the continent. Many of them had received the catalogue by mail.

Although only 52 books were listed in this extraordinary auction catalogue, the passions of the bibliophiles were excited because Jean Nepomucene Auguste Pichauld, Comte de Fortsas, who had died aged 69 on September 1 of the previous year, had a special passion of his own: he collected books of which only one copy existed, some of them new and previously unheard of sources. His heir, it seems, was offering the books for sale. "Buy, I conjure you, at any price, the follies of our rascally grandfather", wrote the Princess de Ligne to her agent, urging him to buy one of the Fortas collection's listed items, the one and only copy of her grandpere's memoir, Mes Campagnes.

In the days leading up to August 10, the hotels of Binche must have been booked out, for prospective purchasers flocked to the town. However, on the very day, it was announced in a broadside which suddenly appeared that the sale had been cancelled, and that the Count had donated his collection to the local library. The fact that there was no public library in Binche dismayed the buyers even further, but it soon dawned on the throng that they had been duped. Someone discovered that there was no Comte de Fortsas either.

Renier-Hubert-Ghislain ChalonThe elaborate hoax had been contrived by Renier-Hubert-Ghislain Chalon (1802 - 1889; pictured), a retired military officer, prominent numismatist and sometime practical joker. In his later years he was made honorary life President of La Société Royale de Numismatique de Belge.

Biblio-Fraud    More   And more  

 

 

February 28, 1874 | Arthur Orton, the false claimant to the Tichborne fortune, was found guilty of perjury.

 

Orton and TichborneThe strange Tichborne Case

So ended a celebrated English impersonation case. In March 1853, Roger Charles Tichborne, heir to the ancient Hampshire baronetcy, sailed for South America. On April 20 he departed from there on the Bella for Jamaica. The ship sank, and Tichborne was not heard of again. In October 1865, 'RC Tichborne' showed up in Wagga Wagga, Australia, in the person of a man known locally as Tom Castro.

On Christmas Day, 1866, Tichborne/Castro landed in England where he claimed the baronetcy. The real Roger's mother, Dowager Lady Henriette Felicité Tichborne, confirmed the impostor as her son, though the rest of the family was not deceived at all. We should note here that antique pictures show that Roger Tichborne was a very slender man, but the claimant was very obese, looking about twice the weight of Roger.

Finally the impostor lost in court, where he was revealed as Arthur Orton, son of a Wapping (England) butcher. Orton found himself sentenced to 14 years' hard labour. The false claimant to the Tichborne fortune had been found guilty of perjury after 260 days, in the longest trial in English history to that time.

The Gilbert and Sullivan opera Trial by Jury is said to have been based on the famous Tichborne Case.

"Henriette died before the trial got to court. Eventually, Orton was convicted of fraud and perjury. He was sent to prison for 14 years, and after serving ten years, he was released and immediately sold his story to a newspaper for £3,000. He died a few years later, and his gravestone was inscribed: 'Sir Roger Charles Doughty Tichborne; born 5 January 1829; died 1 April 1898'."   Source  

 

October 20, 1912 "On October 20th, 1912, readers of the New York American were regaled with a startling and perhaps history-making story in a lavish two-page spread. Paul Schliemann, grandson of Heinrich Schliemann, the famous archeologist who excavated Mycenae and the legendary city of Troy, revealed that his grandfather on his deathbed produced a mysterious bequest for any of his heirs willing to devote their life to proving the existence of Atlantis. He claimed that he had spent years following up on this and now was about to produce actual physical evidence of the reality of the fabled lost continent. Or was he ..."   Source

Heinrich Schliemann in the Book of Days    Atlantis in the Scriptorium

December 28, 1917 | USA: In a hoax article, 'A Neglected Anniversary', American journalist HL Mencken celebrated the 75th anniversary of the advent of the bathtub in America and lamented that the notable event had passed without notice. The New York Evening Mail published his facetious essay on the history of bathtubs in America.  

"To Mencken's amazement and delight, this history of the triumphant American tub was swallowed and spread by newspapers and radio stations across the country. The "facts" were duly incorporated into reference books; the health and hygiene industry, not to mention the plumbers, touted the happy day; the White House calendar-makers, noting Mencken's claim that Millard Fillmore (chosen surely for his name) was the first President to install one, paid tribute to his tub."   Source

 

 

November 28, 1994 | Alan Sokal, a lecturer from the Department of Physics at New York University, wrote 'Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity', a hoax article that was published in good faith as a genuine research paper in the postmodernist cultural studies academic journal, Social Text of Spring/Summer 1996.

The article contains a number of statements that Sokal stated were "a pastiche of left-wing cant, fawning references, grandiose quotations, and outright nonsense". At one stage he asserts that "physical reality is at bottom nothing more than a social and linguistic construct", and at another he proposes that the New Age concept of the morphogenetic field actually constitutes a "cutting edge theory of quantum gravity".

 

 

Unicorn skeleton from Otto von Guericke's Protogaea (1663)

April 12, 1985 | USA: Federal inspectors declared that four animals of the Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Circus were not unicorns (one was called 'Lancelot, the Living Unicorn'). They were, in fact, goats with surgically implanted horns. It was not a first: in the 19th century, showman PT Barnum himself had exhibited what he claimed to be the skeleton of a unicorn.

Pictured: Unicorn skeleton from Otto von Guericke's Protogaea (1663). The skeleton was pieced together from mammoth and possibly rhinoceros remains. Notice that the unicorn skeleton has no hind legs." Source: Clifford Pickover's Encyclopedia of Hoaxes

Unicorns, horned gods, in Book of Days    More

 

 

I, Rigoberta Menchú, hoaxer

December 10, 1992 | Mayan Indian Rigoberta Menchú Tum was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for her work opposing US-sponsored military dictatorships, terrorism and genocide in Guatemala.

 

The prize was given to one of the greatest hoaxers of the 20th century "in recognition of her work for social justice and ethno-cultural reconciliation based on respect for the rights of indigenous peoples".

Wikipedia tells us that her prize was based in part on her 1987 autobiography I, Rigoberta Menchú. Several years later anthropologist David Stoll conducted a series of interviews with Menchú's former acquaintances for a follow-up book. During this time he discovered that her account was largely fabricated. Specifically, Menchú was not self-taught (she received a middle-school education) and the land dispute in which her father was killed was with family members, not the government. She even described, movingly, witnessing the death by starvation of a brother who in fact died years before she was born. No steps have been taken by the Nobel Committee to revoke Menchú's award.

The 'autobiography' was was in fact written by a French leftist, Elisabeth Burgos-Debray, wife of Marxist Regis Debray, "who provided the foco strategy for Che Guevara's failed effort to foment a guerrilla war in Bolivia in the 1960s", according to well-known author and Salon.com columnist, David Horowitz ('I, Rigoberta Menchú, liar').

Her defenders claim that any dishonesties are offset by the overarching importance of her tale of US-funded Guatemalan suppression of the Indian people.

Menchú's response to her critics: she suggests that their charges should be dismissed as political, while falsehoods in her account should be forgiven … because they're political.

Her own excuse when confronted : "It tells my personal testimony, but it also has parts of the testimony of the collectiveness of Guatemala," she said. "For common people such as myself, there is no difference between testimony, biography, and autobiography ... What we do is tell what we have lived, not just alone." 

I, Rigoberta Menchú : An Indian Woman in Guatemala by Rigoberta Menchú

Rigoberta Menchu and the Story of All Poor Guatemalans

500 Years of Sacrifice Before Alien Gods     Rigoberta Menchú meets the press

Women Nobel Prize Laureates    Heroines of Peace     Biography

 

 

Japanese archaeologist's fraud

Devil undermines Japan's Palaeolithic research

Shin’ichi FujimuraNovember 5, 2000 | Japanese archaeologist and Vice Chairman of the private Tohoku Palaeolithic Cultural Research Institute, Shin'ichi Fujimura, apologized for faking sensational archaeological discoveries. He had been caught on the Mainichi Shimbun newspaper's video cameras as he buried eight stoneware pieces shortly after 6 a.m. on October 22.

Formerly known as 'God's hand' or the 'divine digger' for his luck in finding important artefacts, Fujimura began making his earliest discoveries as an amateur archaeologist in the 1970s. The self-taught scientist had earned his reputation with a series of finds including a remarkable discovery in 1981 of stoneware dating back 40,000 years. He is said to have been involved in research centred around 186 sites. Although in a brief press interview on December 18, 2001 Fujimura would deny rumours that more dig finds he was involved in were also fakes, he later admitted to having falsely planted items at another 41 sites, including pieces he once labelled as the world's oldest connected stone tool. The two parts had been excavated separately at two different sites about 30 km apart. Fujimura had claimed that both were 100,000 years old.

"The devil made me do it"

Rumours of problems in Japan's Early and Middle Palaeolithic research had been circulating for a long time and Mainichi Shimbun put together an investigation team to look into all of these rumours. Confronted with the damning evidence the disgraced archaeologist admitted that he buried the items because he was "desperate [to find stone tools] ... voices in my head told me that I had to do something". Asked why he had perpetrated such a deceit, Fujimura answered tearfully, "The devil made me do it".

The fraudster, his grand career now in tatters, broke down in tears as he faced the media at a news conference at the Miyagi Prefectural Government headquarters in Sendai. "I personally planted them and no one else took part. Please don't discredit the whole dig, because there were some authentic finds," Fujimura said. "My actions were a disgrace ... I'm really sorry for my family and friends."

The fraud had yielded unintended consequences. Since the unearthing of Fujimura's so-called Stone Age tools was announced in Tsukidate in 1993, the town had been in the epicentre of a Japanese archaeology boom. Flintstone-like characters became town mascots, and Tsukidate adopted as a motto: "Come and see the skies that were admired by the original man". Soon tourists were flocking by the thousands to admire the region's archaeological sites, and 'original man' noodle shops sprang up in town. A road was renamed The Original Man Way, and an Original Man Marathon quickly became a popular annual event drawing runners from all over Japan.

Fujimura publicly confessed that he had buried 61 out of 65 items that were unearthed from the Kami-Takamori dig at Tsukidate, Miyagi Prefecture. He had also fabricated caches at the Soshin-Fudozaka site in Hokkaido. On at least one occasion, he had even taken reporters straight from a news conference to a site and 'discovered' artefacts on cue. Despite this, and the fact that any trained archaeologist could have seen that the soil around the caches had been disturbed, the deception was well received in Japanese academic circles for two decades.

The dig at Kami-Takamori, thanks largely to Fujimura, had become famous worldwide as the oldest Early Palaeolithic site in Japan, with the ages of eight or more cultural layers ranging from 500,000 to 700,000 years. Even more significant amongst scientists was the fact that several finds of stone artefacts indicated levels of symbolic cognition in Homo erectus much earlier than anything suspected from African and European evidence.

Rewriting the textbooks

If it had been true, the Kami-Takamori 'finds' could have rewritten the textbooks on human evolution. However, some archaeologists, such as Oda Shizuo and Charles T Keally, had, since at least 1985, published skeptical papers on the direction in which Japanese Palaeolithic archaeology was travelling.

Most scholars today accept that human beings lived in northern China at least by 700,000 years ago. We know Japan was connected to the continent by land bridges at least twice during the past 700,000 years, and that large terrestrial mammals migrated into the islands over those land bridges. However, Fujimura's fraud has raised questions of whether humans beings really were in Japan before 35,000 years ago.

Fujimura's fraudulent discoveries perhaps had been accepted by the Japanese academic elites, as well as the public, because they confirmed a popular notion – the great antiquity of the Japanese people. Even the Mainichi English edition reportage, which used the word 'fraud' on November 7, had attenuated this to the more comfortable term 'fabrication' the next day. Many scholars have also begun to question not only the closed academic environment, but also the Japanese educational standards that allowed such a hoax to take root and thrive.

 

November 9, 1966 | Paul McCartney died. At least, that was what the worldwide 'Paul is Dead' rumour of 1969 alleged.

The 'Paul is Dead' rumour started with a series of events in the 1960s that led many fans of The Beatles to believe that McCartney was actually dead and had been replaced with a look-alike ... Read on in the Book of Days

 

 

 

October 30, 1938 | Orson Welles's Mercury Theatre broadcast a radio dramatisation of English writer HG Wells's War of the Worlds - listeners took it as a real newscast of a Martian invasion and panic broke out. The original novel's English author was not pleased by the performance. Wells is reported as having said on the following day, "the dramatisation was made with a liberty that amounts to a complete rewriting and made the novel an entirely different story. It's a total unwarranted liberty".

"The author of the original novel, H G Wells, was not particularly impressed. On the following day he is reported as saying 'the dramatisation was made with a liberty that amounts to a complete rewriting and made the novel an entirely different story. It's a total unwarranted liberty'. By 1940 his attitude had somewhat mellowed because he was happy to meet and be interviewed by Orson on live American radio. Why had his early antipathy evaporated? It might have something to do with the fact that the broadcast and publicity had boosted sales of one of his more obscure novels."   Source

 

January 24, 2004 | Britain's Telegraph reported on the find of a 'baby dragon'. It was, of course, a cute hoax. An author, Allistair Mitchell, was so desperate to get his fantasy book published that he staged had a dragon made by model makers Crawley Creatures.

 

 

ChattertonNovember 20, 1752 | Birth of Thomas Chatterton, English poet, who produced all his work by the age of only 17, when he committed suicide (August 24, 1770).

The former child prodigy produced some of the most remarkable works in English literature that, even as forgeries, were brilliant in and of themselves. However, his publishers took advantage of him and paid him only pennies for his work, and often he would have no food for days.

Thomas Chatterton's father had died before the poet's birth at Bristol, England. Also named Thomas Chatterton, he was a musical genius, a poet, a numismatist, a dabbler in the occult, a sub-chanter at Bristol Cathedral and master of the Pyle Street free school …

Read on at the Thomas Chatterton: Boy genius and forger page in the Scriptorium

 

 

Great Moon Hoax, detail from an engravingAugust 25, 1835 The New York Sun perpetrated The Great Moon Hoax.  

The articles were falsely attributed to Sir John Herschel (1792 - 1871), perhaps the best-known astronomer of his day (and nephew of Caroline Herschel).

The headline read:

GREAT ASTRONOMICAL DISCOVERIES

LATELY MADE
BY SIR JOHN HERSCHEL, L.L.D. F.R.S. &c.

At the Cape of Good Hope

[From Supplement to the Edinburgh Journal of Science]

 

 

Cardiff Giant

October 16 1869 | The Cardiff Giant, one of the most famous American hoaxes, was discovered, in New York state by workers digging a well behind the barn of William C 'Stub' Newell in Cardiff.

It became the subject of huge interest and debate, with some saying it was an ancient statue and others saying it was a petrified human giant from days of old. Eventually it turned out that the Giant was the creation of a New York tobacconist named George Hull who spent $2,600 having the Giant carved and buried but who sold the creation for $37,500 to a syndicate of five men headed by David Hannum. It was moved to Syracuse, New York for exhibition.

It drew such crowds that showman PT Barnum (1810 - 1891) offered $60,000 for a three-month lease of it. When he was turned down he made a plaster replica and put it on display, claiming that his was the real giant and the Cardiff Giant was a fake. As the newspapers reported Barnum's version of the story, David Hannum was quoted as saying, "There's a sucker born every minute." This was in reference to the suckers paying to see Barnum's giant. Over time, the quotation has been misattributed to PT Barnum himself ... Read on in the Book of Days

 

 


Wilson is working on the next article

 

 

Index of articles on folklore and other topics

External links

List of hoaxes at Wikipedia

Meet a 'Stone Age' Man So Original, He's a Hoax

More scientific hoaxes

Scientific misconduct (Wikipedia)

Strange Hoaxes That Endure

The Piltdown Inquest

Hoaxes of the Ages

Hoaxbusters

Hoax warnings

Moon Landing Hoax?

The Museum of Hoaxes

Internet hoaxes, email rumours and urban legends - Current Netlore  

Is this song a hoax?

Scientists don't read the papers they cite

Where are they (scientific frauds or accused frauds) now?

The DHMO Hoax

And finally, from the polymathic Mr Pickover: Cliff Pickover's Internet Encyclopedia of Hoaxes  
(and spend a few days at Cliff's incredible homepage - "10,000 links from beyond the edge")

Piltdown Man

If you enjoyed this page, click to receive similar items daily with a free subscription to Wilson's Almanac ezine

Webmaster, webmasters free content, or else articles at very reasonable rates
Pip Wilson's articles are available for your website or publication, on application. Further details

 

* Who was Piltdown Man?

Piltdown Man (Eoanthropus dawsoni) was a hoax or sniggle which was perpetrated, possibly by Charles Dawson and/or others, on paleontologists from November 1912 until 1953.

Dawson claimed to have discovered an ancient hominid skull in Piltdown quarry, near Uckfield in Sussex in England, and gave it the Latin name reproduced above. The find was written up by mainly British paleontologists as the 'missing link' between ape and man, seeming as it did to feature a human-like cranium and an ape-like jaw. There was considerable scepticism until a second similar skull (Piltdown II) was reported uncovered in 1915. However later hominid finds revealed Piltdown man to be more and more of an anomaly and by the late 1930s it was effectively ignored. Following fluorine absorption tests in 1949 and redating of the Piltdown gravel beds it was finally revealed as a hoax on November 21, 1953.

It consisted of the skull of a medieval human, the 500-year-old lower jaw of a Sarawak orangutan and chimpanzee fossil teeth. To aid to the appearance of age the bones were stained with a iron solution and chromic acid. To remove the evidence for the lack of fit the jawbone was carefully broken and the teeth filed and patched to fit. This filing of the teeth, in fact, led to doubt being cast over the skull - by chance it was noticed that the top of one of the molars sloped at a very different angle to the other teeth. Microscopic examination revealed scratch-marks on the teeth. Filing was necessary as apes chew their food in a different way to humans.

The survival of the hoax for forty years was largely down to luck. While the discoverers were well respected, and the skull matched expectations (brain development before the jaw) and was well forged for its time it was quickly shown to be out of place and was ignored, but not dismissed as a forgery.

Assigning responsibility for the hoax has been a minor academic industry for a number of years. Charles Dawson was naturally the prime suspect, but a number of prominent persons had been to the site at various times, including Arthur Conan Doyle and Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, and various theories were proposed naming them. The general idea was that a practical joke had been played on Dawson, or on paleontologists generally, but the locking away of the specimen had prevented immediate discovery, and the huge publicity for the discovery had caused the hoaxer to keep silent.

The perpetrator has never been discovered with absolute certainty, and, short of finding a diary recording the forging, never will, but the candidate on whom most suspicion has recently fallen is one Martin A.C. Hinton. In 1970, a trunk bearing his name and containing letters to him was discovered in storage at the Natural History Museum in London: the trunk also contained animal bones and teeth that had been carved and stained in a manner identical to the Piltdown artefacts.

In November 2003, the Natural History Museum in London held an exhibition to mark the 50th anniversary of the hoax's exposure.

Source: Wikipedia

Hoaxes in the news

 

 

Tell friends about this page

 


See the archives and a place to subscribe

 

Gifts, books, software, DVDs, videos, music, computers and more - all supporting our research and the Almanac

You never know who you might meet when you click here

 

Subscribe free
Almost Prophetic Quotes
"Because our readers are bored 
with the usual quotations"

Subscribe free
Wilson's Almanac
Illustrated free daily ezine
"Think universally. Act terrestrially."